← All posts
Tools & Methodology 3 min read

Why We Use Shiller Data Instead of Recent Index Funds for Backtesting

Modern index funds only exist since 1976. To backtest 155-year FIRE plans, we use academic data series that go further back.

TL;DR

Shiller's S&P composite is the longest reliable equity series, going back to 1871. Actual index funds (VFINX, etc.) only have track records to 1976. For studying long-horizon FIRE risk, we need the older data.

In short

Critics argue Shiller's pre-1957 reconstruction is imperfect — true. But it's by far the best available, and the 1871-1957 period adds critical stress scenarios (1907 panic, WWI, 1920s bull, Depression). Excluding it would make the dataset less honest about tail risk, not more.

More on this soon

We're working on a full deep-dive for this article — including historical data, charts, and worked examples. In the meantime, you can run a free simulation to explore the underlying numbers yourself.

Frequently asked questions

What about pre-1871?
Data exists (Schwert, Wilson-Jones) but quality drops sharply and US equity markets were a different animal before the late 1800s. We start at 1871 for that reason.
Does using fund-level data change the results?
Slightly. Real funds have expense ratios that the academic series don't. We subtract a default 0.15% from displayed returns to approximate this, and you can adjust the assumption in the simulator.

Stress-test your own FIRE plan

FIRE Wealth OS runs your savings rate and expenses against every historical market starting point since 1871. Free to use, no card required.